Re: [cdt-dev] CDT Build (was: CDT Call Tomorrow)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] CDT Build (was: CDT Call Tomorrow)

From: Jesper Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:37:02 +0200
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505)

Chris Recoskie wrote:

+0.25 from me...
While I agree that things are a nightmare right now and that you have towrite Java code anyway if you are not supporting GCC, I don't want to beentirely forced to write everything in Java either.

I don't think anyone is suggesting that. It shouldn't be too difficultto let the two ways (Java/XML) coexist peacefully.


--
/Jesper

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] CDT Build (was: CDT Call Tomorrow)
  - From: Thomas Fletcher

References:
- Re: [cdt-dev] CDT Build (was: CDT Call Tomorrow)
  - From: Chris Recoskie

Prev by Date: RE: [cdt-dev] Alternatives to Scanner Discovery...
Next by Date: RE: [cdt-dev] add new keyword recognize by the dom parser
Previous by thread: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT Build (was: CDT Call Tomorrow)
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT Build (was: CDT Call Tomorrow)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs