RE: patch for 234860, was Re: [cdt-dev] How to create a CDT Standard Mak

[Beth Tibbitts <tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not a CDT committer but as someone who teaches tutorials, alot of which is CDT, anything to make
the first user experience easier is a big positive.
+1


...Beth

Beth Tibbitts (859) 243-4981 (TL 545-4981)
High Productivity Tools / Parallel Tools http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM T.J.Watson Research Center
Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511
"Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/02/08 10:01 AM

Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: patch for 234860, was Re: [cdt-dev] How to create a CDT Standard MakeProject

+1, or more precisly +0.1. I am worried about the late churn, but something should be done about this. I believe the impact is a net positive.
 
Doug.

---

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:58 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: patch for 234860, was Re: [cdt-dev] How to create a CDT Standard MakeProject

Everyone,

I have looked at this patch and am of the opinion we should commit it. Please take a look and see if you object. I am awaiting a more refined patch from the submitter before I think about committing it, but if no one objects to the basic idea of the patch I will commit it sometime in the next couple of days (but not before tomorrow morning Eastern time in order to give everyone a chance to object).

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=234860

===========================

Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt

Chris Recoskie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA

Chris Recoskie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/30/2008 01:18 PM

Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [cdt-dev] How to create a CDT Standard Make Project

I would like the chance to look at the patch before we decide. I'll start this during the afternoon. I'll let you know what I think. We're in the home stretch now so we have to be extra careful about whatever we put in up until GA.

Thanks,

===========================

Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt

Elena Laskavaia <ELaskavaia@xxxxxxx>

Elena Laskavaia <ELaskavaia@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/30/2008 01:00 PM

Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [cdt-dev] How to create a CDT Standard Make Project

I can look at this but we had a feature freeze and I though we cannot do 
such changes now.
If everybody thinks it is ok to change in 5.0 I can apply the patch.

Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> As per my previous message. I'm not counting on build patches getting
> applied anytime soon until we get new blood working on the build system.
>
> Doug. 
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vladimir Prus
>> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:15 AM
>> To: CDT General developers list.
>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] How to create a CDT Standard Make Project
>>
>> On Friday 30 May 2008 18:37:10 Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
>>     
>>> Dear all,
>>>  
>>> Thanks for the very positive responses to this message.
>>>  
>>> I didn't find a proper existing bug in bugzilla, so I filed 
>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=234860
>>>  
>>> Vladimir, attaching your patch on that bug would be highly 
>>> appreciated. I encourage all interested parties to CC on the bug.
>>>       
>> Done.
>>
>> On Friday 30 May 2008 18:50:52 Schaefer, Doug wrote:
>>     
>>> The easiest solution would be to create an Empty template 
>>>       
>> for each of 
>>     
>>> the project types that don't have one. Creating templates is 
>>> documented in CDT's ISV docs. Or you can follow the examples of the 
>>> ones that are already there.
>>>       
>> Why is this better, given that the code patch already exists?
>>
>> - Volodya
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>   
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev