[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] catchpoints feature
|
Elena,
I've reviewed the proposal. Overall, I have no objections to this
coming in for 5.0. However, I've added two new sections to the talk
page pointing out issues I have with the proposal and that I would
like to see addressed.
John
At 09:36 AM 4/18/2008, Elena Laskavaia wrote:
Proposal on this page:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT:_Debug:_Catchpoints_support
1) We need to agree on UI and workflow
2) Public APIs
3) Extensions for populating catchpoints. It is related to hardware
breakpoints type, because we can use same extension. This is the most
debatable one.
Please take a look. I have an implementation of it right now, but I am
still debating in my head extension points...
John Cortell wrote:
>
> Elena,
>
> At the CDT call-in earlier, you discussed moving forward with a
> catchpoint solution. Looking at the volume of debate and proposals on
> the WIKI page
>
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Talk:CDT:_Debug:_Catchpoints_support#File_-.3E_New
>
>
> it's hard to determine what exactly you plan to move forward with. Is
> it your initial proposal? Is it some variation of the proposal that
> has been shaped by these discussions?. If you could provide a
> detailed description of what that is, then I think we could all put
> in our vote for that move.
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
