The other side of the $0.02 coin, the side I'm more worried about is
areas that people aren't working on. I'd like to discuss those more
often at meetings and work together on solutions instead of always
relying on individuals to do everything.
So my current thought is to start this next week. I'd like to move it to
11:00 a.m. EST (Ottawa time) every other Wednesday. this seems to be the
Eclipse standard meeting time to make as many people happy as possible.
I'll keep an eye on the Eclipse project review schedule too since it's
at the same time and make sure we don't conflict and adjust when
necessary.
Thanks,
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:37 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT Conf Calls
My $0.02 is that it's impossible for me to keep track of every single
bugzilla, and I probably try harder than most given that I'm leading a
team. I definitely agree with Doug that it becomes hard to keep track
of what's going on everywhere.
I would find everyone's five minute status report actually useful to
hear, compared to the large amounts of silence that we have in our
regular calls.
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
"Mikhail
Khodjaiants"
<Mikhail.Khodjaia
To
nts@xxxxxxx> "CDT General developers list."
Sent by: <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cdt-dev-bounces@e
cc
clipse.org
Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT Conf Calls
01/30/2008 07:03
AM
Please respond to
"CDT General
developers list."
<cdt-dev@eclipse.
org>
In theory the information on who is working on what should be in
Bugzilla.
And we have so many committers that getting status reports would be
quite tedious. But I agree that we need to clarify the plans.
Regarding the time, I would prefer to start earlier.
Another issue is that many people who participate in the CDT calls also
participate in the DSDP/DD calls which happen to be at the same day. I
would suggest to change the schedule of one of these calls.
Regards,
Mikhail K.
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:45 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT Conf Calls
I'm definitely changing the format. I think it's important to get back
to back to getting status reports from everyone on the call. Part of the
problem I'm having is understanding what everyone is working on, or more
importantly, not working on. It's important that the community knows
that so they can make plans.
My current thought is to do it bi-weekly every other Thursday starting
with next week keeping the same time. 1 p.m. EST. While we're doing that
I'd like to hear from the European crowd whether this is a good/bad time
and whether the Pacific crowd could start earlier and whether the EST
crowd would mind meeting at lunch time. Any (public ;)
opinions/objections.
Cheers,
Doug
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:45 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT Conf Calls
Doug,
I think more frequent calls would help if we change the format a bit,
maybe have each committer talk about what they have been working on
since the last call and plan to work on before the next one. If someone
is not currently working on anything CDT related that's good to know
too. Of course we could still cover all the project management and
release stuff too.
- Ken
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of ext Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:45 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT Conf Calls
Hey gang,
We have our regularly scheduled conf call next week for February.
As well, as I'm getting used to having weekly internal meetings here at
Wind River, I was wondering if there was any appetite to having the CDT
calls more often. I feel we're losing a bit of momentum on the CDT, at
least relative to what we had going with CDT 4. Possibly having regular
calls where we can get into the habbit of debating issues would help.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Doug.
--
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
the information in any medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
