[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Speaking of Linux Desktop
|
We have very little in terms of developer docs, the codebase is huge,
complex and its largely uncommented. This means, and I can verify from my
own experience, that ramp-up time for developers new to CDT is very long.
If we want to attract contributors that would be interested on working on
CDT just for fun or hobby, then CDT needs to be more accessible, we need
vastly better developer documentation. Just my opinion.
Mike Kucera
Software Developer
IBM CDT Team, Toronto
mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx
Doug Schaefer
<DSchaefer@xxxxxx
m> To
Sent by: "CDT General developers list."
cdt-dev-bounces@e <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
clipse.org cc
Subject
07/12/2007 04:13 [cdt-dev] Speaking of Linux Desktop
PM
Please respond to
"CDT General
developers list."
<cdt-dev@eclipse.
org>
Got this in my Google Alerts today.
http://forums.devx.com/showthread.php?p=483772#post483772
This is the kind of thing that makes me concerned about the state of CDT on
Linux Desktop. Why are we not as good as kdevelop and anjuta as the one guy
claimed? And even if we know that, who?s going to contribute to make it
better?
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
