[cdt-dev] Re: [ptp-dev] Proposal for EFS integration with CDT

[Tianchao Li <lit@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I am very excited to see the rebirth of discussion on EFS support for 
CDT. As always, I am advocating the EFS as the most feasible solution 
for remote support. The analysis of performance impact made by Doug is 
exactly what I would say.
In order not to start everything over, I would like to remind you of our 
previous efforts made on this issue in the PTP project, which are 
described on our wiki page: 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/PTP/designs/remote/cdt and 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/PTP/designs/remote/progress . In 
particular, I would like to remind you of a existing patch that provides 
minimal EFS support for CDT at 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=142092 .

Best regards,
Tianchao

Doug Schaefer wrote:
> Hey gang,
>
> We’ve talked about this in the past and I want to capture it as a work 
> item for the next CDT release. So I have raised a bug on supporting 
> remote files via EFS with the CDT. Feel free to add yourself to the CC 
> list or any comments, pro or con, to the bug. Of course, given recent 
> discussions on the CDT list, I’m most interested in how the CDT will 
> perform in this environment, plus whether or not this is even feasible.
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=177994
>
> Cheers,
>
> Doug Schaefer, //QNX Software Systems///
> //Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com///////
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ptp-dev mailing list
> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>