[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDT Modules view needs to catch upwith 3.3M5

Doug,
 
The bug number is https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=173792. I have made changes and the Modules view is working now with some restrictions. I am also using two internal classes but I am planning to replace them. There are also problems with labels for the children of IBinary.
 
Mikhail

________________________________

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Fri 09/02/2007 20:56
To: CDT Debug developers list; CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDT Modules view needs to catch upwith 3.3M5



That's good new Mikhail. Could you (or Darin) raise a quick bug report targeting M5 so we can track the progress of this issue.

 

Thanks,

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member

________________________________

From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mikhail Khodjaiants
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:47 AM
To: CDT Debug developers list
Subject: RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDT Modules view needs to catch up with 3.3M5 

 

Darin,

 

I have been following the changes you've made for M5 and will try to migrate the Modules view to M5 during this weekend. It would be very helpful if you guide me. 

 

Thank you,

Mikhail

________________________________

From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Darin Wright
Sent: 08 February 2007 21:11
To: cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-debug-dev] CDT Modules view needs to catch up with 3.3M5 


The Modules View will need to catch up with changes in Eclipse 3.3M5. The modules viewer subclasses 'AsynchronousTreeViewer', which no longer exists (it has been replaced by TreeModelViewer). 

I'm not familiar with the view, but it looks almost like a copy of the Variables View. I can help someone do the migration. If someone can contact me, perhaps we can come up with a simpler migration scheme than re-writing the view (perhaps we could subclass the variables view). 

Thanks, 

Darin Wright

-- 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium.  Thank you.