Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Problems with indexing/searching

Hi Larry,
in general bugs are not discussed on this mailing list. You
can find the discussion in bugzilla. The bug you are referring
to has been fixed:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=155324

Markus.

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Larry Streepy
Sent: Mittwoch, 24. Jänner 2007 21:39
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Problems with indexing/searching

I haven't seen any discussionon this for a while, so I'll ask: has this 
been addressed in the new 4.0 RC?  It would really be nice to have a 
functional indexer to use on my code base.  Right now, eclipse for C++ is 
not much better than vi because it has none of the navigational or 
reference searching available due to a busted indexer.

Sorry to vent, but it's been very frustrating.

If it's been addressed and I missed the message (I've been watching cdt-dev 
ever since I posted this), I apologize.

Thanks,
Larry.

Sergey Prigogin wrote:
> Exactly my experience. See bugzilla 155324 
> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=155324>.
> 
> -sergey
> 
> On 10/12/06, *James Hawkins* <truiken@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:truiken@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     On 10/12/06, Larry Streepy <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>      > I've updated to the latest versions of the CDT and I'm still having
>      > trouble with the indexer.
>      >
>      > Here's some environmental data:
>      > Running on CentOs (Linux variant)
>      >
>      > Eclipse version 3.2.1
>      > CDT version 3.1.1.2006092708
>      >
>      > My project is big, but not massive (roughly 250,000 lines of C++
>     code).
>      >
>      > First, I just couldn't seem to get it to index my code properly
>     at all.
>      >   The indexer would run for less than a minute and emit no
>     messages, so
>      > I thought things were just fine.
>      >
>      > Then I would try to do a navigate to a type (Navigate->Open Type) and
>      > I'd start typing in the name of *any* of the classes defined in
>     my code
>      > and none of them are present.  The only things present seemed to be
>      > coming from some of my system includes, but nothing from my code
>     base.
>      > I tweaked a lot of settings and then told the indexer to run and
>     off it
>      > went (and has been going for more than an hour now).
>      >
>      > I looked in the eclipse .log file and I'm seeing several
>      > StackOverflowError messages being emitted, so something is definitely
>      > off with the indexer.  Here's a portion of one of the stack traces:
>      >
>      > java.lang.StackOverflowError
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.db.ShortString.compare(ShortString.java:202)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.dom.PDOMNamedNode$NodeFinder.compare(PDOMNamedNode.java
>     :85)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.db.BTree.accept(BTree.java:226)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.db.BTree.accept(BTree.java:229)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.db.BTree.accept(BTree.java :229)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.db.BTree.accept(BTree.java:195)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.dom.cpp.PDOMCPPLinkage.adaptBinding(PDOMCPPLinkage.java:292)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.dom.cpp.PDOMCPPLinkage.resolveBinding
>     (PDOMCPPLinkage.java:316)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.PDOM.resolveBinding(PDOM.java:248)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPScope.getBinding(CPPScope.java:134)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPSemantics.lookup
>     (CPPSemantics.java:1019)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPSemantics.resolveBinding(CPPSemantics.java:613)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java
>     :164)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPASTName.resolveBinding(CPPASTName.java:52)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.dom.cpp.PDOMCPPNamespace.getBinding(PDOMCPPNamespace.java:146)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPScope.getBinding
>     (CPPScope.java:136)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:350)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:191)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPASTName.resolveBinding(CPPASTName.java:52)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.dom.cpp.PDOMCPPNamespace.getBinding(PDOMCPPNamespace.java:146)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPScope.getBinding
>     (CPPScope.java:136)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:350)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:191)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPASTName.resolveBinding(CPPASTName.java:52)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.dom.cpp.PDOMCPPNamespace.getBinding(PDOMCPPNamespace.java:146)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPScope.getBinding
>     (CPPScope.java:136)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:350)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:191)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPASTName.resolveBinding(CPPASTName.java:52)
>      > ...
>      >
>      >
>      > There are two basic forms of stack overflow that have been occuring,
>      > here's a sample of the other:
>      >
>      > java.lang.StackOverflowError
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.ASTNode.getTranslationUnit(ASTNode.java:108)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.ASTNode.getTranslationUnit(ASTNode.java
>     :108)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.ASTNode.getTranslationUnit(ASTNode.java:108)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.ASTNode.getTranslationUnit(ASTNode.java:108)
>      > org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPScope.getBinding
>     (CPPScope.java:128)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPClassScope.getBinding(CPPClassScope.java:238)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPSemantics.lookup(CPPSemantics.java:1019)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPSemantics.postResolution(CPPSemantics.java:665)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPSemantics.resolveBinding(CPPSemantics.java:629)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding
>     (CPPVisitor.java:297)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:191)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPASTName.resolveBinding(CPPASTName.java:52)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.dom.cpp.PDOMCPPNamespace.getBinding(PDOMCPPNamespace.java:146)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:350)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding
>     (CPPVisitor.java:191)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPASTName.resolveBinding(CPPASTName.java:52)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.pdom.dom.cpp.PDOMCPPNamespace.getBinding(PDOMCPPNamespace.java
>     :146)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:350)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPVisitor.createBinding(CPPVisitor.java:191)
>      >
>     org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.dom.parser.cpp.CPPASTName.resolveBinding
>     (CPPASTName.java:52)
>      > ...
>      >
>      >
>      > I have increased the heap size and thread stack size considerably
>     (with
>      > -vmargs -Xmx2048M -Xss512M) so I don't think it's mu configuration.
>      >
>      > Any ideas on what might be wrong?  Has this behavior been seen
>     before?
>      > I did search the archives and other blogs, but I didn't find anything
>      > directly relevant.
>      >
> 
>     I run into this problem when trying to index the source of the Wine
>     code base.  The indexer either doesn't run at all, runs but stops
>     because of stack overflow, or it runs to completion (or so it says)
>     but only recognizes some (a very limited amount) of my information.
> 
>     --
>     James Hawkins
>     _______________________________________________
>     cdt-dev mailing list
>     cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top