RE: [cdt-dev] New project model

["Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, to be able to look at an unstable patch in December is helpful for
us.
Markus. 

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Voronin, Mikhail
Sent: Freitag, 01. Dezember 2006 13:55
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] New project model

Markus, will it be useful for you to have unstable patch in December or
it will be OK to wait till January (keeping in mind long holidays :))? 

Regards,
Mikhail.
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sennikovsky, Mikhail
>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 3:34 PM
>To: CDT General developers list.
>Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] New project model
>
>I don't think the prototype will be stable enough by the end 
>of December
>to be committed to the database.
>The only thing that might be considered is posting the prototype (that
>might be buggy by that time) for review to the bugzilla.
>
>Mikhail
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Voronin, Mikhail
>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 3:19 PM
>To: CDT General developers list.
>Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] New project model
>
>Is it possible to contribute initial working prototype in december?
>
>P.S. Mikhail, did you look at abstract I submitted to EclipseCon? Any
>comments?
>
>Regards,
>Mikhail.
> 
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>>[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sennikovsky, Mikhail
>>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 2:47 PM
>>To: CDT General developers list.
>>Cc: Brunauer, Walter
>>Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] New project model
>>
>>Hi Markus,
>>
>>The New Project Model work is in progress now. Most of the new
>>functionality is implemented. Since most of the new Project Model
>>features depend on each other and affect different areas of
>>functionality we can not commit them in peaces to ensure CDT integrity
>>and stability.
>>
>>We are currently planning to perform the major commit 
>>containing most of
>>the primary functionality in the end of January 2007.
>>Since the commit is going to be quite big, we are definitely going to
>>post patches for review/testing to the New Project Model 
>>bugzilla before
>>committing them.
>>
>>To bring some clarity to the integration process of the Core 
>>New Project
>>Model with other core functionality here are some of my thoughts
>>regarding this:
>>
>>My plan is to make the integration of the New Project Model with other
>>core functionality as painless as possible to avoid merge 
>conflicts and
>>reduce amount of work necessary for integration. From the 
>indexer point
>>of view all "information provider API" used by the indexer currently
>>(LanguageManager, ScannerInfoProvider, etc.) will be kept and will be
>>used in the normal way: 
>>- Since the new project model will contain the new per-language
>>Includes/Symbols settings functionality that will replace the current
>>path entries framework, the new ScannerInfoProvider is 
>implemented that
>>provides the scanner info based upon the New Project Model settings.
>>- since the New Project Model will allow language settings 
>>customization
>>(i.e. in case more than one languages are associated with one content
>>type, the New Project Model will allow specifying the language to be
>>used).
>>I have added few new methods to Language manager for getting the
>>language e.g. given an IFile, etc. to allow obtaining the necessary
>>language for the file. I have also modified the 
>LanguageManager clients
>>to use these new methods.
>>
>>Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about 
>>the dates
>>or integration details. We could discuss them by phone if necessary
>>(e.g. on the next Indexer call)
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mikhail
>>
>> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>On Behalf Of Schorn, Markus
>>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:16 PM
>>To: CDT General developers list.
>>Cc: Brunauer, Walter
>>Subject: [cdt-dev] New project model
>>
>>Hi Mikhail!
>>I am wondering what the current progress on the new project model is.
>>I'd like to understand when you are planning to commit the changes to
>>CVS.
>>Is it going to be a all-in-one commit (which milestone?), or are you
>>planning a couple of independent steps? Can we get early access to
>>patches, so that we can try out things up front?
>>
>>Markus.
>>_______________________________________________
>>cdt-dev mailing list
>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>_______________________________________________
>>cdt-dev mailing list
>>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev