[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Patch proposal forbugzilla154854-gdbconsoleenhancem ents
|
PMC Approval can come from one of the members of the Tools PMC. BTW, I am
one of those members. If you aren't getting a response from me, try the
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list.
Cheers,
Doug Schaefer
QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:11 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Cc: CDT General developers list.; cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Patch proposal
forbugzilla154854-gdbconsoleenhancements
The legal statement comes in the form of the contribution questionnaire.
See http://www.eclipse.org/legal/ContributionQuestionnairePart1-v1.0.php
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
"Oberhuber,
Martin"
<Martin.Oberhuber To
@windriver.com> "CDT General developers list."
Sent by: <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cdt-dev-bounces@e cc
clipse.org
Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] Patch proposal
25/08/2006 06:57 forbugzilla154854-gdbconsoleenhance
AM ments
Please respond to
"CDT General
developers list."
<cdt-dev@eclipse.
org>
Hi CDT committers,
Currently, the "significant contribution" limit seems to
be at 250 lines of code, including configuration files: See
http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
I'm not exactly sure what rules you follow on CDT,
but for Target Management we have come up with some
nice guidelines:
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/development/committer_howto.php
Basically we ask contriutors to add some legal statement
like "I wrote this myself" to the bugzilla entry upfront,
in order to clarify the Legal things without having extra
E-mail exchange.
Regarding PMC approval, Bjorn has blogged that a single
PMC member's opinion may stand for the entire PMC:
http://eclipse-projects.blogspot.com/2006/06/pmc-question.html
This means its sufficient if you send an E-Mail to the
Tools PMC Mailing list, asking OK to apply the contribution,
and you get at least one PMC member's OK (that would be
Doug S I guess). Other PMC members can veto this later,
then you'd have to remove the patch again, but this is
really unlikely I guess.
But as I said, each project has its own guidelines, and
DougS is your master -- I just thought that giving you
the two links above might be helpful.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ploett, Norbert
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:47 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: AW: [cdt-dev] AW: [cdt-patch] Patch proposal
> forbugzilla154854-gdbconsoleenhancements
>
> Davide / (Mikhail),
>
> I also have this 100-line rule in the back of my head and I
> assume that you will need to fill in the
> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/ContributionQuestionnairePart1-v1.0.php
>
> This implies that we must get PMC approval for your
> contribution, I'll have yet to find out how this is obtained
> (anyone knows?).
>
> I also think that somehow you must prove that your company
> lets you put your contributions under the EPL (as you stated
> you would in the headers of the new files ...)
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Norbert
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
