Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] FYI: Eclipse 3.2.1 RC schedule

I agree on all points, I think it looks good to go in.

- Ken

> From: ext Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:06:35 -0400
> To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI:  Eclipse 3.2.1 RC schedule
> 
> My $0.02 CDN...
> 
> Based on both the description and looking at the patch, I think this is
> small and low risk enough that I don't see why it couldn't go into 3.1.1.
> I look at the new feature rule as more of a guideline :-)
> 
> Others can feel free to disagree but that's my take on it.
> 
> ===========================
> 
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
> IBM Toronto
> http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
> 
> 
> 
>                  
>              "Mikhail
>              Khodjaiants"
>              <Mikhail.Khodjaia                                          To
>              nts@xxxxxxx>              "CDT General developers list."
>              Sent by:                  <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>              cdt-dev-bounces@e                                          cc
>              clipse.org
>                                                                    Subject
>                                        RE: [cdt-dev] FYI:  Eclipse 3.2.1
>              15/08/2006 04:21          RC schedule
>              AM  
>                  
>                  
>              Please respond to
>                "CDT General
>              developers list."
>              <cdt-dev@eclipse.
>                    org>
>                  
>                  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> There are several bugs I was planning to fix for 3.1.1. One of them
> (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=136896) is a patch to
> support the binary format for variables and registers. It wasn't applied
> to 3.1 because of legal issues. It was approved shortly after 3.1 was
> released. It is formally a new feature and I am not sure if it should be
> in 3.1.1. What do you think?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mikhail K.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
> Sent: 14 August 2006 15:44
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] FYI: Eclipse 3.2.1 RC schedule
> 
> Since we've talked before about doing CDT 3.1.1 at roughly the same time
> as Eclipse 3.2.1, I thought I'd forward this...
> 
> Release Candidate Builds toward Eclipse 3.2.1  Wednesday, August 16 -
> 3.2.1 RC1 build  Build toward 3.2.1RC1 at 8 am.
> 
> 
>  Wednesday, August 23 - 3.2.1 RC2 build
>  Build toward 3.2.1RC2 at 8 am if map files are updated.
>  goal: a good build for the test pass on Monday, August 28.
> 
> 
>  Wednesday, August 30 - 3.2.1 RC3 build
>  Build toward 3.2.1RC3 at 8 am.
> 
> ===========================
> 
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
> IBM Toronto
> http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev



Back to the top