RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken

[Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>]

That did the trick. Thanks, Markus.

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Schorn, Markus
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:30 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken

Yes, that's what I finally did today, so after an update it should work
for
everybody, does it?

Markus.
  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
> Sent: Montag, 03. Juli 2006 17:00
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken
> 
> Setting the compliance level to 1.4 gives you the compile 
> errors. You have
> to manually set the source and classfile compliance to 1.4 to 
> fix. I'm not
> sure why the have it set up that way.
> 
> To ensure others don't get the compile error, you should 
> probably set the
> project properties to properly reflect the compliance level 
> you are using
> instead of relying on people to set their preferences correctly.
> 
> And, for now, don't set them to 5.0.
> 
> Cheers,
> Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
> Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
> http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Schorn, Markus
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 3:57 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken
> 
> Hi,
> I am the one that checked in the code containing the assert. It does
> not require java 1.5, but it requires 1.4. 
> 
> Are you building with -source 1.3?
> Markus.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Ryall
> > Sent: Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 21:21
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken
> > 
> > Doug,
> > 
> > Like some of the other folks we've been assuming that the 
> > platform would
> > move to 1.5 and CDT would follow. We would really like to see 
> > CDT 4.0 move
> > to 1.5, both so we can use the new language features and to minimize
> > operational problems. Everything else we are doing is using 
> > 1.5 and we would
> > like to stop having to step backward to 1.4 when working in 
> > CDT or on code
> > that we think might later be contributed to CDT.
> > 
> > I don't think requiring 1.5 a year from now is unreasonable.
> > 
> > Thanks - Ken
> > 
> > > From: ext Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>
> > > Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:57:01 -0400
> > > To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken
> > > 
> > > Just talking to a couple of Platform people on 
> > #eclipse-dev, there doesn't
> > > seem to be a rush to move to 1.5 down there.
> > > 
> > > That doesn't prevent us as a community from deciding to 
> > make the jump. But
> > > we need to make sure we don't mess up anyone who can't 
> move to 1.5.
> > > 
> > > So is there anyone who can't move? Or who want to make sure 
> > that they can
> > > keep running 1.4 in case it turns out they can't move?
> > > 
> > > I have no preference either way.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev