Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken


I will also be very disappointed for CDT and eclipse not adopting to 1.5 yet, even though the standard was out for quite some time (2-3 years). I am especially annoyed with not able to use the new 'for' construct and 'generics' for CDT development.

Regards,
-Bala




John Cortell <john.cortell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

30/06/2006 15:32

Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken





I for one would be very disappointed if CDT didn't adopt 1.5. I'm
itching to use the new language features. My understanding all along
was that the platform would adopt 1.5 once 3.2 went out the door and
everyone else would probably follow suit.

John

At 09:26 AM 6/30/2006, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>It looks like a 1.5-ism that has crept into HEAD which brings us to the
>decision point of whether to switch to 1.5 for CDT 4.0. Since the platform
>will likely be 1.5 I'd say go for it.
>
>Does anyone think they'll still need Java 1.4 next year?
>
>Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
>Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
>http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
>Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 10:22 AM
>To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [cdt-dev] HEAD is broken
>
>Do we have to use the Eclipse 3.3 stream now?  I didn't get the memo...
>
>Severity and Description      Path  Resource    Location    Creation Time
>Id
>assert cannot be resolved to a type
>org.eclipse.cdt.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/viewsupport
>AsyncTreeContentProvider.java line 172    1151676738562     6580
>assert cannot be resolved to a type
>org.eclipse.cdt.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/viewsupport
>AsyncTreeContentProvider.java line 321    1151676738562     6584
>Syntax error on token ".", = expected
>org.eclipse.cdt.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/viewsupport
>AsyncTreeContentProvider.java line 172    1151676738562     6581
>Syntax error on token ".", = expected
>org.eclipse.cdt.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/viewsupport
>AsyncTreeContentProvider.java line 321    1151676738562     6585
>The method getCurrent() is undefined for the type AsyncTreeContentProvider
>org.eclipse.cdt.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/viewsupport
>AsyncTreeContentProvider.java line 172    1151676738562     6582
>The method getCurrent() is undefined for the type AsyncTreeContentProvider
>org.eclipse.cdt.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/viewsupport
>AsyncTreeContentProvider.java line 321    1151676738562     6586
>
>===========================
>
>Chris Recoskie
>Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
>IBM Toronto
>http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev




*******************************************************************
*** Symbian Software Ltd is a company registered in England and
Wales with registered number 4190020 and registered office at 2-6
Boundary Row, Southwark, London, SE1 8HP, UK. This message is
intended only for use by the named addressee and may contain
privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the
named addressee you should not disseminate, copy or take any action
in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error
please notify postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx and delete the message and any
attachments accompanying it immediately. Neither Symbian nor any of
its Affiliates accepts liability for any corruption, interception,
amendment, tampering or viruses occurring to this message in
transit or for any message sent by its employees which is not in
compliance with Symbian corporate policy. *************************
*********************************************


Back to the top