RE: [cdt-dev] Beyond CDT 3.1

[Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>]

Well, there is a little bit of work I'm planning for as soon as we cut the
branch to try and add C# support using our existing ILanguage framework. So
we'll have 4.0 content pretty quickly.

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sennikovsky, Mikhail
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 9:25 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Beyond CDT 3.1

>If we do decide to do a 3.2 we'll have to decide soon, otherwise HEAD
will
>quickly get polluted with 4.0 work.
If we decide to do a 3.2 we should consider having two separate branches
in CVS right after the 3.1: one for the 3.2 and one for the 4.0 since
most of us will start working on the 4.0 tasks right after the 3.1. 
Thus we should keep the 4.0 activity exposed in CVS in order to make
sure that new parts of functionality are in synch with each other and
well tested.

Mikhail

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:04 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Beyond CDT 3.1

Alright I'll put together my thoughts and will post something late this
week/early next.  Nothing is definite yet, I'm just putting the idea in
everyone's minds.  I need to go over our IBM TODO list and see which of
our
need dates line up with the end of this year (when a hypothetical 3.2
would
happen) and which line up with 4.0.

The driver for a 3.2 from IBM's point of view would be our own content
that
we would be looking to contribute.  A year is a long time to not be able
to
deliver/consume any new features (which you can't do in a service
release
as per the Eclipse rules).  If anyone else had features they wanted to
contribute, they would be welcome to tag along.

If we do decide to do a 3.2 we'll have to decide soon, otherwise HEAD
will
quickly get polluted with 4.0 work.

===========================

Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt



 

             Doug Schaefer

             <DSchaefer@xxxxxx

             m>
To 
             Sent by:                  "CDT General developers list."

             cdt-dev-bounces@e         <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

             clipse.org
cc 
 

 
Subject 
             28/06/2006 08:48          RE: [cdt-dev] Beyond CDT 3.1

             AM

 

 

             Please respond to

               "CDT General

             developers list."

             <cdt-dev@eclipse.

                   org>

 

 





Cool. Yes that would be a good topic. I don't think we have enough
resources
to do another release before next June. I'm certainly not interested in
participating in one (just to give a flavour of where that conversation
will
go :). I'll be spending a lot of time on 3.1.1 to get the PDOM into
better
shape and that will probably lead to a 3.1.2 and so on. The items we
have
for 4.0 are pretty big and won't fit in a smaller release cycle.

Not everyone is going to be on the call, so please make your proposal
here.

Thanks,
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com


-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 7:51 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Beyond CDT 3.1

Over in IBM land we're currently toying with the idea of whether or not
we'd like to see a CDT 3.2.  This would be a good topic of discussion
for
next week's call.

===========================

Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt




             Doug Schaefer
             <DSchaefer@xxxxxx
             m>
To
             Sent by:                  "CDT General developers list."
             cdt-dev-bounces@e         <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
             clipse.org
cc

 
Subject
             27/06/2006 08:28          [cdt-dev] Beyond CDT 3.1
             PM


             Please respond to
               "CDT General
             developers list."
             <cdt-dev@eclipse.
                   org>






Hey gang,

It looks like we?re about to wrap up CDT 3.1. I?ll give it until
tomorrow
morning Ottawa time for any final no-go?s.

Once we?re final, I?ll also create the cdt_3_1 branch so that we can
start
both the CDT 3.1.1 maintenance work and the CDT 4.0 feature work.

Feel free to contact me for any last minute issues.

Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com

 _______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev