[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Linker must be the target Tool ?
|
Hi Enrico,
I was not aware of this problem - maybe Chris or Mikhail is. I suggest
that you add a bugzilla report. This is probably left over from a
couple of releases ago when a tool-chain had to end with the linker or
archiver.
Regards,
Leo
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Enrico Ehrich
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:51 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] Linker must be the target Tool ?
Hi,
I see you are busy with the RC3 release but I have something to ask,
sorry ;)
Actually I'm creating a little managed builder plugin for an ARM gcc to
use for an embedded system (Nintendo DS).
I don't want spent allot time on this, because I do this in my spare
time and simply want use and share it.
So I though I can use the usual gnu MBS which is included in the CDT.
That was easier as I though so a made a
new plugin and inherited the buildDefinitions from
org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.gnu.ui and added my special options etc..
The problem I had was, that I need some additional build steps by
default as the predefined: cpp,cc,as,ld
I need to convert the linked ELF file to an absolute code file and then
convert it to a special ROM file with header and so on.
Therefor I added 2 more tools with options, input/outputTypes and set
the "targetTool" to the last tool and the extension to
the final file extension (e.g. *.nds) in the toolChain.
So it worked well but one thing is not working as I guessed:
The static link libraries (-l) and additional object files does not
appear in the autogenerated objects.mk file.
I analysed it and found that the makefile generator class search for
this special "libs" and "userObj" valueTypes in the
"targetTool". But my targetTool is not the linker!!
I don't want write my own MBS thats too much work. Now I made the
workaround that the libs are added as usual stringList
to the command line. The same with the other objects but I have to take
care about the order.
But I think thats not the right way.
I simply wanted to ask if this problem is known ? Or I missed something
and it works using some other tricks ?
It would be nice if this scenario will be supported in future releases
of CDT.
ciao
Enrico
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier
anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
