So far the score is
nil-nil. Kinda like watching a World Cup game. L
Ill vote go. Ive been
using it on some real projects and things look reasonably O.K. There have been a
couple of exceptions reported so an RC4 is looking more likely but Id like to
get RC3 out for more testing in the community.
Either way, please
vote.
Thanks,
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:47
AM
To: CDT General developers
list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] Call
for Status on I200606120500 as RC3
Hey
gang,
The time has rolled around again for
another RC call. Weve made some great progress and the bug count is now sitting
at 3. Thanks to everyone for their hard work in making sure we have a great
quality CDT 3.1.
Please submit your go/no-go. Ill
tally the results tomorrow morning and if were good to go Ill announce this
build as RC3. If not, well respin and try again.
Just a reminder that our process now
shifts to critical but safe fixes only for the next two weeks. If we find that
there are significant fixes going in, Id like us to consider an RC4 next
Monday, just to make sure we test for regressions.
Here is the list I have. Note that
mine isnt a code change:
129782
|
Chris Recoskie
|
Andrew Ferguson
|
ASSI
|
3.1 |
GnuMakefileGenerator can generate
invalid makefiles via o... |
142268
|
Doug Schaefer
|
Lawrence Mandel
|
NEW |
3.1 |
CDT zips must include epl_v10.html
and notice.html |
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software
Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC
member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com