So far the score is nil-nil. Kinda like
watching a World Cup game. L
I’ll vote go. I’ve been using
it on some real projects and things look reasonably O.K. There have been a
couple of exceptions reported so an RC4 is looking more likely but I’d
like to get RC3 out for more testing in the community.
Either way, please vote.
Thanks,
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:47
AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] Call for Status
on I200606120500 as RC3
Hey gang,
The time has rolled around again for
another RC call. We’ve made some great progress and the bug count is now
sitting at 3. Thanks to everyone for their hard work in making sure we have a
great quality CDT 3.1.
Please submit your go/no-go.
I’ll tally the results tomorrow morning and if we’re good to go
I’ll announce this build as RC3. If not, we’ll respin and try
again.
Just a reminder that our process now
shifts to critical but safe fixes only for the next two weeks. If we find that
there are significant fixes going in, I’d like us to consider an RC4 next
Monday, just to make sure we test for regressions.
Here is the list I have. Note that
mine isn’t a code change:
129782
|
Chris Recoskie
|
Andrew Ferguson
|
ASSI
|
3.1
|
GnuMakefileGenerator can generate
invalid makefiles via o...
|
142268
|
Doug Schaefer
|
Lawrence Mandel
|
NEW
|
3.1
|
CDT zips must include epl_v10.html and
notice.html
|
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC
member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com