[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Call for Status on I200606120500 as RC3
|
Doug,
We have one bug opened targeted to the 3.0.1 related to the parser: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=120400
So before voting I think we should clarify the status of this bug as well.
I guess it should be retargeted to the proper target in order not to get lost.
Mikhail
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 6:07 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Call for Status on I200606120500 as RC3
Excellent. And when I said the bug count sits at 3 I meant 2. One
disappeared on me :).
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:04 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Call for Status on I200606120500 as RC3
I was going to suggest the same, but you beat me to it :-P
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
"Treggiari, Leo"
<leo.treggiari@in
tel.com> To
Sent by: "CDT General developers list."
cdt-dev-bounces@e <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
clipse.org cc
Subject
12/06/2006 09:58 RE: [cdt-dev] Call for Status
AM on I200606120500 as RC3
Please respond to
"CDT General
developers list."
<cdt-dev@eclipse.
org>
Our release process is working much better this time around! Good job by
everyone!
I suggest that 129782 be deferred to 3.1.1. I don?t think it fits the
category of ?critical but safe?.
Thanks,
Leo
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:47 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] Call for Status on I200606120500 as RC3
Hey gang,
The time has rolled around again for another RC call. We?ve made some great
progress and the bug count is now sitting at 3. Thanks to everyone for
their hard work in making sure we have a great quality CDT 3.1.
Please submit your go/no-go. I?ll tally the results tomorrow morning and if
we?re good to go I?ll announce this build as RC3. If not, we?ll respin and
try again.
Just a reminder that our process now shifts to critical but safe fixes only
for the next two weeks. If we find that there are significant fixes going
in, I?d like us to consider an RC4 next Monday, just to make sure we test
for regressions.
Here is the list I have. Note that mine isn?t a code change:
12978 Chris Andrew ASS 3. GnuMakefileGenerator can generate
2 Recoskie Ferguson I 1 invalid makefiles via o...
14226 Doug Lawrence NEW 3. CDT zips must include epl_v10.html
8 Schaefer Mandel 1 and notice.html
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
