| AW: [cdt-dev] Call for status I200605290500 as RC2 |
|
Hi Doug,
I have tested a feature that you were working on, the
Declarations / Definitons search. Details see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=143388 .
Since in my environment the results are worse than ever I'll vote
-1
for I200605290500.
Now I don't want to sound too harsh, I am aware that there
are many other people around who don't encounter these problems and I can be
persuaded to change my mind if it turns out that I am sort of an execeptional
case.
Then again, the result of _my_ tests was that the C/C++
Search features are not working any more at all in my environment, so for the
time being it is -1.
Maybe there will be so many +1s that I'll be outvoted
anyway. Or do you need an unanimous vote?
I'll help gladly to supply more information and help
finding the problem if someone will tell me what to look at.
Thanks,
Norbert Ploett
Von: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Doug Schaefer Gesendet: Montag, 29. Mai 2006 16:10 An: CDT General developers list. Betreff: [cdt-dev] Call for status I200605290500 as RC2 Hey gang, please send in your
go/no-go status for this morning’s build as RC2. The main criteria for a go is
that the features you’ve been working on are testable, which if course is left
to interpretation. As such, as a minimum I’d like to hear from all committers
who contributed to RC2 since RC1: Markus S, Doug S, Ken R, Mikhail K, Mikhail S,
Andrew N, Chris R, and Dave I. However, I encourage everyone else to try it out
as well and make sure your features haven’t been
broken. Also, as a reminder, for the
remainder of the 3.1.0 release, please report any bugs that you fix to the
cdt-dev list. I know I have a handful left. The next milestone, RC3 is in two
weeks. After that we should only be fixing critical bugs as we close up to our
final RC4 two weeks after that. Cheers, Doug Schaefer, QNX Software
Systems Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC
member |