Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] GNU Tool-chain for Solaris

Title: Message

I have made 2 changes to handle the Solaris Gnu problems:

 

1.  For 3.0.2 and Head, I have added an “Expert settings” area to the Tool option page (in C/C++ Build properties) with a text field that allows the user to change the command-line pattern for the tool.  This will allow users to fix problems like the “space after output-flag” problem without creating a new project-type.

2.  For Head (3.1), I have created separate Solaris Gnu project-types with the only difference being the command-line pattern.  I would appreciate it if someone who uses CDT on Solaris would give this a try.

 

Thanks,

Leo

 


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lott, Jeremiah
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:35 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] GNU Tool-chain for Solaris

 

This is basically what I remember too.  Although I also think there were some people who were using or extending the default toolchain definitions for their own compilers who couldn't handle the space.(?)  We added that space in, and their compilers that were previously working suddenly started having errors, so we changed it back.  At least I kind of remember something like that.  However, I think maybe at that time this space/no space was hard-coded into the system, rather than customizable via xml, so the decision was to return it to its original state for compatability.(?)  My memory is a little fuzzy, though.  Anyone else remember this?

 

  Jeremiah Lott

  TimeSys Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:06 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] GNU Tool-chain for Solaris

I think it was because we had one variant that couldn’t handle the space (macosx comes to mind). I actually think we have more variants that need the space than can’t handle it.

 

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems

Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com

 


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Treggiari, Leo
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:03 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] GNU Tool-chain for Solaris

 

I think that the “generic” GNU compiler definition has never had a space after the –o.  I don’t know the reason.

 

Leo

 


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:56 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] GNU Tool-chain for Solaris

 

This issue has always bugged me. Do we know/remember why we don’t have a space after the ‘-o’?

 

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems

Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com

 


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Treggiari, Leo
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:51 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] GNU Tool-chain for Solaris

 

I have heard from a few people with a problem using the built-in GNU tool-chain on Solaris because a space is required after the –o output flag.  Currently, they have to modify the tool-chain to get it to work.  Is there anyone using Solaris who has not had to modify the tool-chain?  I will create Solaris specific project types with a space after the output flag if no one speaks up.  What I don’t want to do is make the change and then find that a different implementation of the GNU tool-chain on Solaris requires that a space not be present.

 

Thanks,

Leo

 


Back to the top