[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 3.0 Candidate Build Now Available
- From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:00:35 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=q9BtaxgSCE8zH4TJm6oHYdBMyi+Az2BkPSbsp3B32Qh39AQ+XZG1n0BuH/UIQ1K5/bgKyqrJB2O9cAAIGrYc5m0SzLAe4izSh5hMF50IfZ/EohPI3nZ+fXSovcZTPSgnCB/hdDY+0RfjnmruP2i+7brszjSwHvUPvP4LomxpwuM= ;
Devin did a fair amount of sanity testing this morning as well. But yes, feel free to wait for James before casting your vote. I certainly won't close the vote before hearing from him.
And yes, I will create the branch as soon as we're GA. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who has write access to all the plugins, though. But it is a mighty power to be weilded carefully :-)
Alain Magloire <alain@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 3.0 Candidate Build Now Available
> Thanks Devin for all your great work on this release.
> I hereby call for a vote for this build to be declare CDT 3.0 GA.
Why not wait on James's feedbacks; it should give some times to all folks to
look at it.
On the last email, you were saying that 3.0 were tagged. Do we still have
the same plan to branch (after all the +1 for GA); I believe you are the
only one to have all the commit access on __all__ the plugins 8-)
cdt-dev mailing list