RE: [cdt-dev] heads up: 106036

["Recoskie, Chris" <crecoskie@xxxxxx>]

It's partially a chicken and egg problem as well.  The community doesn't
really start banging on anything until late in the cycle because they
want to avoid churn and to get all the bug fixes they can.  But you
don't get the quality up unless people start playing with it...

___________________________________________
 
Chris Recoskie
Software Designer
IDE Frameworks Group
Texas Instruments, Toronto
 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:36 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] heads up: 106036
> 
> Recoskie, Chris wrote:
> 
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=106036
> >
> > We might ask for a rebuild for this today... rather than waste time
> > doing multiple rebuilds it would probably be good to delay the
rebuild
> > until we decide whether this is going into 3.0. I hope we will close
> > on that by the afternoon.
> >
> 
> O.K. I am still in a holding pattern. You know this is really pointing
> at the need to extend, or at least enforce, the release candidate
cycle.
> We are getting some great testing that we really needed earlier in the
> cycle if there wasn't so much coding going on ;-) .
> 
> Cheers,
> Doug
> 
> > ___________________________________________
> >
> > Chris Recoskie
> >
> > Software Designer
> >
> > IDE Frameworks Group
> >
> > Texas Instruments, Toronto
> >
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cdt-dev mailing list
> >cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Doug Schaefer, Senior Software Developer
> IBM Rational Software, Ottawa Lab
> Kanata, Ontario, Canada
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev