[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] New code: IOptionApplicability - Merge conflict
|
> I
didn’t see anything in your proposal for the shared tool options about
an IHoldsOptions ...
That is correct. I discussed with Leo last
week whether to replicate a lot of the functionality which is implemented
in ITool for holding options also in IToolChain or whether to move it down
to an interface, IHoldsOptions, which Tool and ToolChain implements.
I.e.
- public interface ITool extends IBuildObject,
IHoldsOptions {
- public interface IToolChain extends IBuildObject,
IHoldsOptions {
- public class Tool extends HoldsOptions implements
ITool, IOptionCategory {
- public class ToolChain extends HoldsOptions
implements IToolChain {
> ITool
extend IHoldsOptons
That's what I have done. But the signature
of the call-backs is not generic enough, i.e. if the code is to work in
all situatiuons the first argument has to be of a different type.
Regards
-- Lars
"Recoskie, Chris"
<crecoskie@xxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
31/05/2005 20:21
|
Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "CDT General developers list."
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [cdt-dev] New code: IOptionApplicability
- Merge conflict |
|
I didn’t see anything in your
proposal for the shared tool options about an IHoldsOptions interface,
so forgive me for shooting in the dark, but can you not just have ITool
extend IHoldsOptons?
___________________________________________
Chris Recoskie
Software Designer
IDE Frameworks Group
Texas Instruments, Toronto
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lars.Kurth@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 3:00 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] New code: IOptionApplicability - Merge conflict
Hi,
I am trying to merge the latest changes from CDT-build such that I can
prepare a patch for CDT tomorrow. The following newly introduced code is
causing difficulties:
- IOptionApplicability has methods, which
use ITool as parent for an option
- We have moved all functionality which
was in ITool and had to do with the capability of holding options into
a common interface IHoldsOptions
- I have a real merge conflict with the
function IOptionApplicability.isOptionEnabled() which would have to have
the type IHoldsOptions
- For the other members of IOptionApplicability
this would probably be necessary as well
How
would this be resolved?
Regards
-- Lars
**********************************************************************
Symbian Software Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with
registered number 4190020 and registered office at 2-6 Boundary Row, Southwark,
London, SE1 8HP, UK. This message is intended only for use by the named
addressee and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If
you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, copy or take
any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error
please notify postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx and delete the message and any attachments
accompanying it immediately. Neither Symbian nor any of its subsidiaries
accepts liability for any corruption, interception, amendment, tampering
or viruses occurring to this message in transit or for any message sent
by its employees which is not in compliance with Symbian corporate policy.
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
