RE: [cdt-dev] Proposing Mikhail Sennikovsky for MBS committer

[Douglas Schaefer <dschaefe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>From my reading of the governance, no. The committers of the Project vote 
in new committers. cdt-build and it's peers are subsystems, not projects. 
So following that logic, we are committers on the CDT project who have 
write access to certain subsystems and get to vote in new *CDT* 
committers. I'm missing the governance, though, that determines how to 
add/remove subsystems to your write list. But anyway, vote away...

Doug Schaefer, Senior Software Developer
Ottawa Lab, IBM Rational Software Division



John Camelon/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA 
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/02/2005 09:55 AM
Please respond to
"CDT General developers list."


To
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] Proposing Mikhail Sennikovsky for MBS committer







Do I need to be a committer on the build plugins to vote? 

JohnC
www.eclipse.org/cdt 

cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/01/2005 11:27:43 AM:

> It's not clear to me whether I get to vote after nominating, but if I
> do:
> 
> +1
> 
> Leo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Treggiari, Leo
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 1:30 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Proposing Mikhail Sennikovsky for MBS committer
> 
> I'd like to nominate Mikhail Sennikovsky for committer in the Managed
> Build System component.  Mikhail works for Intel.
> 
> Mikhail provided the CDT 1.2 and 2.0 project conversion design and
> implementation for CDT 2.1.
> 
> For CDT 3.0, he has provided 3 designs:
> 
> -  Tool-chain Installation Support (# 87478)
> -  Managed Build Process Environment and Build Paths support (# 88497)
> -  Managed Build Macros proposal (# 89210)
> 
> He has provided patches for the first 2 and is working on the third.
> 
> I am nominating Mikhail because:
> 
> -  His designs and implementations have been excellent.
> -  He is very productive and dedicated.
> -  He makes very good engineering tradeoffs.
> -  He has become familiar with most parts of the MBS
> -  He knows Java very well (better than I do...).
> 
> I don't think that Mikhail has a lot of visibility with other CDT
> committers.  You can take a look at his designs and/or at the patch that
> he submitted today (and I have applied), if you want to.  I am
> nominating him now, rather than waiting for him to gain more visibility,
> because I am going to need help in the CDT 3.0 "end-game".  I will be
> away for 10 days in June for my son's graduation and there will likely
> be a large volume of patches that will need to go in from mid-May until
> the 3.0 GA.  This is not to suggest in any way that I don't feel
> confident in nominating Mikhail at this point in time.
> 
> Please give his nomination your consideration.
> 
> Thanks,
> Leo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev