Re: [cdt-dev] Thoughts on Fortran and Language Independence

[Craig Rasmussen <crasmussen@xxxxxxxx>]

On Apr 5, 2005, at 5:19 PM, Jeffrey Overbey wrote:
> The majority of the changes between the CDT and Photran were textual 
> substitutions in the user interface.   Making these language-neutral 
> is easy... if it isn't C/C++-specific, put it in the CLDT UI, and make 
> the name more generic.  We might have a Compiled Language Development 
> Perspective, a generic Standard Makefile Project (shared by all 
> languages), and a menu item to Run Local Binary Application.

......

> There are likely a number of plug-ins where we changed only strings, 
> and where a single "internationalization"-style effort would make them 
> more reusable. The same disclaimer may apply.

I'd like to second Jeff's ideas on this.  Getting all of the strings 
out of java files would be a big help.

Cheers,
Craig