[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] List of performance improvements for CDT 3.0
|
What aspect of performance were you concerned with? If you are talking
about responsiveness to UI gestures, my understanding is that GTK is much
faster than Motif. Other factors affecting performance of some of CDT
features would be disk performance and cache sizes. Eclipse isn't
generally a CPU bound application, except when asking for lots of parse
information.
Doug Schaefer
Ottawa Lab, IBM Rational Software Division
leonp@xxxxxxxxx
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/24/2005 07:23 AM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [cdt-dev] List of performance improvements for CDT 3.0
On Thursday 24 March 2005 13:58, Thomas Fletcher wrote:
> Anything in particular you are looking for?
Sorry to interfere - a small fact:
I bought new Opteron-64-3200 and fast RAM 512MB in a hope it will speed-up
Eclipse/CDT.
No visible improvement in performance against my previous
Athlon-1200...:-((
It is strange, but it is...
Is there any difference in using Motiff or GTK?
--
Leon Pollak
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
