RE: [cdt-dev] Feedback on "Multiple Tool Inputs and Outputs design"

RE: [cdt-dev] Feedback on "Multiple Tool Inputs and Outputs design"

From: "Recoskie, Chris" <crecoskie@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:51:46 -0600
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcUmbujdbsBl6zBXSbKaoME47xba/wABP18QAEEQrsAARwpBIA==
Thread-topic: [cdt-dev] Feedback on "Multiple Tool Inputs and Outputs design"

>Would it meet your needs if primaryOutput=False and option not specified

>meant to not add the output file to the command line at all?

Won’t this mess up the dependency rules then if there is no primary output? You also need this so that MBS can determine the build artifact.

___________________________________________

Chris Recoskie

Software Designer

IDE Frameworks Group

Texas Instruments, Toronto