Re: [cdt-dev] CDT patch format submission

["Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>]

> 
> With Eclipse 3.1 whatever we standardize on can be set on the project 
> *and* have shared in the repository, I believe some of the Eclipse 
> platform plugins (org.eclipse.ui) have gone this way.
> 
> 
> +1
> 

Ping!!  to other commiters
It may look like a "banal" subject ... but the list of CDT contributors
is growing and we need a certain consistency.

> 
> Dave.
> 
> Alain Magloire wrote:
> > Bonjour
> >   the last couple of months reviewing/integrating patches was harder then necessary
> > because of ..  formatting changes:
> > 
> > - moving inner classes from beginning to end
> > - moving inner classes from end to beginning
> > - Some folks do not like anonymous classes and ... extract them to files,
> > - glossing over the brace indentations { }
> > - the "if ( condition ) " vs the "if (condition)" etc ..
> > ...
> > etc ..  'til ad nauseam
> > 
> > 
> > So about to standardise on the "Java Builtin Convention [builtin]" formatter ?
> > Or whatever format .. but let just stick to one ... please.
> >