Re: [cdt-dev] Avaluating CDT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Avaluating CDT

From: Xavier Amatriain <xamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:57:29 +0100
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: MTG (UPF)

>  The thing is that this evaluation (on Eclipse 3.0 + CDT 2.1) has raised

Sorry, I meant CDT 2.0.2.

References:
- [cdt-dev] Avaluating CDT
  - From: Xavier Amatriain

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Avaluating CDT
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Hacking on Content Assist
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Avaluating CDT
Next by thread: [cdt-dev] 2.1 Update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top