[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT-2.1 breaking API changes
|
Being heavily focused on the AST at the moment, I am definitely interested
in your thoughts on structure definition vs structure declaration. From an
AST perspective, there is no such thing as a structure definition. You
declare a structure as a type and then use that type in other
declarations.
However, I haven't looked at the CModel in a long time and can't recall
how things were done there. What were you planning for this?
Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
"Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/16/2004 10:52 AM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[cdt-dev] CDT-2.1 breaking API changes
Bonjour,
We need feedback on this before forging ahead. Some changes that we
want
to apply will break API, compatibility to CDT-2.0.x:
Support for 64 bits, affects:
- binary parsers
- debugger(CDI)
- GDB mi code
Core Model, changes to IStructure:
- inconsistency Structure definition vs Structure
declaration
Debugger CDI changes:
- lots of change in the interface.
Binary parser refactoring:
- break in the GNUParser and CygwinParser
Error parser, see proposal:
- Althought it is backward compatible
could be others ?
feeback/comments ?
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
