Re: [cdt-dev] Respin of CDT-2.0.1(a) ... libspawner

[David Daoust <ddaoust@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I too believe that 69330 should be in
2.0.2.   Is the fix high risk?  Will we need to do a large test
activity?

So far we have the following committed
to 2.0.2:  73250,  71437,  72901 from Alain, and 73378 from
Andrew

        -Dave

"Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/08/2004 09:38 AM

Please respond to
cdt-dev

To	cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	Re: [cdt-dev] Respin of CDT-2.0.1(a) ... libspawner

> 
> I think that we should spin a 2.0.2 to pick up these changes -- I
think 
> that if we respin 2.0.1 we will get confusion (I will certainly be
> confused :-)
> 

+1

> There are a couple of open defects that have been tagged for 2.0.1.
  I 
> would like to evaluate these defects and then spin a RC for 2.0.2.
(or 
> whatever number we decide on)
> 

2.0.2
We've already updated the branch for a few PRs, see the previous email
on this thread
for the numbers.

> Does anybody what to add more defects?  (I would like to try
to limit the 
> defects to critical ones)
> 

PR 69330, is a good candidate.  Talk to aniefer for more details.


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev