Re: [cdt-dev] Plugin upversion time

[Dave Inglis <dinglis@xxxxxxx>]

True, but I believe the platform only changes the versions of plugins 
that are different. (Which is the only reason I brought it up... In 
other words, it doesn't really matter to me :-) )

Dave.

Douglas Schaefer wrote:
> Good question. I'd say yes. When you install 2.0.1 and want to remove 
> 2.0.0, it can see people making mistakes and accidentally removing 
> plugins that are still needed. Also, if we don't do it all at once we'll 
> probably forget when changes do end up being made.
>
> I'm open to arguments the other way, though.
>
> Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
> Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
>
>
> *Dave Inglis <dinglis@xxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 07/15/2004 11:20 AM
> Please respond to
> cdt-dev
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Re: [cdt-dev] Plugin upversion time
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Should the branch plugins version change if no changes have been made to
> the plugin?
>
> Douglas Schaefer wrote:
>  >
>  > Hey gang,
>  >
>  > To get our nightly builds running again, I need to upversion the plugins
>  > et al. I will be numbering the plugins on the branch 2.0.1 and on head,
>  > 2.1.0. I will make sure I minimize the merge impact on the plugin.xml
>  > files.
>  >
>  > Let me know if you have any concerns.
>  >
>  > Cheers,
>  > Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
>  > Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev