Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Progressing towards 2.0 GA

+1 from me Alain.  I think that the occasional Eclipse synchpoint
is good to have, but a predictable schedule is better.  The fact
that the two co-incided right now was planned.  Hopefully we won't
go through that kind of pain until Eclipse 4.0 =;-)

Thomas

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alain Magloire [mailto:alain@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: June 28, 2004 5:25 PM
>To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Progressing towards 2.0 GA
>
>
>> 
>> Right now the CDT is being pulled to meet contributing teams product 
>> delivery schedules. As more parties get involved, this is 
>going to be 
>> difficult to manage. My feel is that the CDT needs to have a 
>life of its 
>> own with a regular and predictable schedule, likely tied 
>somewhat to the 
>> Eclipse schedule.
>
>I was hoping you would not say thiss 8-).  For CDT-2.0, 
>locking ourself to Eclipse-3.0
>was ... difficult at best.  The problem was the constant 
>catchup, not easy to build
>something when the foundation is moving.  If we want to put a 
>solid product out
>for the CDT users, we need time .. so a little more cushion 
>will be benificial.
>
>Of course, IMHO.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>


Back to the top