[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
|
It was pretty clear early on that RC1 was a no go. I'll pump RC2 out at 5
p.m. EST and ask for the go/no go's. All go's == 2.0GA.
Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
"Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/29/2004 04:06 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
>
> This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> --=_alternative 0048E82985256EC2_=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Here is a summary of the CVS activity since Doug split the CDT 2.0
stream.
>
> I have a couple of questions for the community:
> 1. Do any of the head fixes belong in the 2.0 stream?
Yes. Folks have already answer in other posts, mine is below.
> 2. Are there any additional fixes needed in the 2.0 stream?
> 3. When should we build the next RC?
Usually Doug(Mr build) asks the question "go" or "no go" to the commiters,
for a release candidate
>
>
>
> Head
> Alain
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
> Duplicate project when changing nature in the CView
Commited to the branch
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68665 NPE
> from BinarySearchThread
Commited to the branch
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
