[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
|
Hi Mikhail,
Do you have any details on your problem?
We are seeing debugger lockups when the Disassembly View is on, and we
don't know if that's what you're working on...
Cheers,
- Brent
"Mikhail Khodjaiants" <mikhailk@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/29/2004 12:02 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
Sure, I will.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kleanthis Hapitas
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
Thanks Mikhail,
Can we schedule a build for later in the afternoon (say 5:00 pm) and have
you provide an update if you are NOT able to make it for then?
What about the rest of the commits that happened yesterday and today that
Dave D highlighted below? Can the ones that are necessary for the 2.0
stream be pushed by then?
Kleo
"Mikhail Khodjaiants" <mikhailk@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
29/06/2004 11:27 AM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
This afternoon, if successful. I am going hack it for 2.0 - the real fix
needs API changes.
----- Original Message -----
From: Sebastien Marineau
To: 'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
Hi Mikhail,
any idea on an ETA for the debugger problem on Linux?
Thanks,
Sebastien
-----Original Message-----
From: Mikhail Khodjaiants [mailto:mikhailk@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:59 AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
The fix for #45535 should be applied to the 2.0 branch. It didn't make it
because of the timing.
I have to verify #68723 and if it works fine I will apply it too.
There is a debugger problem on Linux that I am working on. I haven't
submitted a bug for it but it's a major problem and it needs to be fixed
in 2.0.
Mikhail
----- Original Message -----
From: David Daoust
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 9:14 AM
Subject: [cdt-dev] CVS activity since the 2.0 stream was split
Here is a summary of the CVS activity since Doug split the CDT 2.0 stream.
I have a couple of questions for the community:
1. Do any of the head fixes belong in the 2.0 stream?
2. Are there any additional fixes needed in the 2.0 stream?
3. When should we build the next RC?
- Dave
Head
Alain
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
Duplicate project when changing nature in the CView
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68665 NPE
from BinarySearchThread
Bogdan
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=67656
[Indexer] getting called twice after creating a project with a file
system
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=60948 indexer
should pick up all headers in include path
Dave Inglis
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68723
Exceptions while running Automated Test suites
Hoda
Patch for Keith Campbell CConventions from cdt-patch list
John
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=60407
[Search] Fails to find methods with certain signatures
Mikhail
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=45535
Performance Problems when debugging
Both the 2.0 Stream and the head stream.
Dave (me) (for Dave Williams)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68786 [MBS]
Binary Parsers tab hidden on Error Parsers page
Sean
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68786 [MBS]
Binary Parsers tab hidden on Error Parsers page