[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Post 2.0 milestones
|
Along with that, IBM's next major activity will be to evolve our
refactoring capability. This is also a likely candidate for a 3.0 release.
We'd probably be ready to start that once 2.0.1 is finished. I'm not sure
yet how long it will take us but it'll surely be well into next year.
Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
"Treggiari, Leo" <leo.treggiari@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/24/2004 12:13 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] Post 2.0 milestones
What about CDT 3.0 (i.e., the next major release)? When would discussions
on functionality and timeframe begin? From Intel’s perspective, the 2.x
Managed Build system doesn’t meet our product requirements, so we are
interested in working on that functionality as soon as possible, and
having it released as soon as possible.
Regards,
Leo Treggiari
Intel Corp.
From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sebastien Marineau
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 12:00 PM
To: 'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Post 2.0 milestones
Hi all,
to follow-up to Kleo's email -- we'd like to get feedback from people on
what would be appropriate timing and scope
for the 2.0.1 and 2.1 releases.
In speaking informally with Kleo and Thomas and looking at what was left
off for CDT 2.0, I looks like the main focus
in the next few months will be on:
1. bugfixing, stability and scalability, especially with handling large
projects
2. finish the Eclipse 3/CDT debugger integration and fully adjust to the
new 3.0 debug framework
3. Finish the hierarchy view in the class browser perspective
With respect to timing, if we follow the Eclipse timelines, we would be
aiming for a 2.0.1 release near end of August.
This might work well as a maintenance release with no major changes or new
features (e.g. the focus would be on #1
above). We could target 2.1 for October and tackle #1, #2 and #3, and
whatever other scope is appropriate.
What do people think? Would this meet the requirements of IBM, QNX and
others?
Thanks,
Sebastien
-----Original Message-----
From: Kleanthis Hapitas [mailto:khapitas@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 2:00 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] Post 2.0 milestones
Hi all,
I have requested that additional milestones get added to the CDT in
bugzilla, and they have just been created. There is now a 2.0.1 and a 2.1
target milestone to choose from. I know we haven't had any concrete
discussions yet as to when the 2.0.1 or 2.1 delivery dates will be, but
with these milestones we can start to distinguish between bugs to be fixed
sometime in the near future and those that will be fixed whenever...
My intention is to provide a target milestone (2.0.1) for defects that we
want to fix on the 2.0 stream after it goes GA at the end of the month,
and another (2.1) for the next release that comes out of the Head stream
after 2.0 reaches GA.
Questions, comments, concerns, let me know...
Kleo