[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: CDT M9 release (was: Re: [cdt-dev] How to use the CDT 2.0 M8 in Eclispe 3.0 M9)
|
I'd be happy to volunteer to do the "What's new and noteworthy", but
unfortuately
a lot of the adjustments are going to be backend changes which just make
peoples
lives better without a lot of foofarah.
Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Capp [mailto:aphelion@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:13 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: CDT M9 release (was: Re: [cdt-dev] How to use the
> CDT 2.0 M8 in
> Eclispe 3.0 M9)
>
>
> As a semi-offtopic plea, would it be feasible to publish
> release notes
> with milestone releases, along the lines of the Mozilla ones?
> Not just a
> feature list, but also some sense of how stable/reliable a
> new feature
> is thought to be, with known bugs and limitations.
>
> Without release notes, there's less motivation to try a new
> release, and
> there's a risk of bugspam floods for known bugs and experimental
> features. Or, worse, NO bugs getting filed for features which are
> supposed to be solid but which the hapless user assumes are
> experimental
> because they don't work for him/her. For example, I've been under the
> impression that neither content assist nor "Open Declaration"
> worked at
> all for C++ code, until reading some recent newsgroup comments.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
> Douglas Schaefer wrote:
> > Which brings up the CDT 2.0 M9 end game plan. I would like
> to take Tuesday
> > morning's build as the M9 candidate. I will wait until I
> get a go from
> > representatives of the major areas of the CDT before
> declaring. We'll
> > respin as necessary. As we have seen, there is hot demand
> for this release
> > so we should make sure it's a good one, or at least good
> enough for people
> > to try out.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
