RE: [cdt-dev] Idea on cvs project creation

[Sebastien Marineau <sebastien@xxxxxxx>]

FYI -- I'm trying to chat with Webmaster to discuss this and see if we can
change our scheme to what Doug proposed. The requested changes sent in are
partially
implemented (as some of you have seen with new projects appearing) but not
all finalized.

Also, I assume that since most others have not expressed opposition to
Doug's proposal, that
they are in favor?

Regards,

Sebastien

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Schaefer [mailto:dschaefe@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:16 AM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Idea on cvs project creation
> 
> 
> +1 the sooner the better. I assume Mike already has the list 
> that maps 
> projects to groups to manage the permissions. I suggest 
> having him create 
> directories with the same names under /home/tools for each group and 
> moving the affected projects under those directories. 
> Shouldn't be too 
> hard. (Man, I wish I had root on dev.eclipse.org... I'd have 
> it for you in 
> 10 minutes)
> 
> Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
> Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
> 
> 
> 
> Sebastien Marineau <sebastien@xxxxxxx> 
> Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 04/19/2004 01:51 PM
> Please respond to
> cdt-dev
> 
> 
> To
> "'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
> 
> Subject
> RE: [cdt-dev] Idea on cvs project creation
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> That's what other projects have done and I think it would 
> make it a lot
> easier and flexible.
> 
> There are a few drawbacks like disruption of currently 
> checked-out src, 
> but
> that
> is something we can manage given that we can probably reach 
> the majority
> of affected folks through the NG and mailing list.
> 
> If we want to do this, we should decide quickly -- Mike (Eclipse 
> webmaster)
> is still
> working on the commiter changes we submitted a while back, 
> but is nearly
> done 
> phase 1 (e.g. the commiter/project rationalization but not 
> the bugzilla
> changes). We can
> probably still switch to your scheme before he commits his 
> changes, but he
> may not
> be too happy about it... better now than later though.
> 
> Sebastien
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Douglas Schaefer [mailto:dschaefe@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 1:30 PM
> > To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [cdt-dev] Idea on cvs project creation
> > 
> > 
> > Hey gang,
> > 
> > It seems our cvs project creation requests seem to flow into 
> > the ether or 
> > at best, take forever to get implemented. Here's a thought I 
> > had after 
> > talking with one of the Eclipse PDE people. One thing we 
> could do is 
> > create CVS projects for each of the committer groups: e.g. 
> cdt-core, 
> > cdt-debug, etc. and then put our plugin projects under them. 
> > This would 
> > then allow committers to create new plugins or features by 
> > themselves. 
> > Aside from the disruption of current checkouts, is there anything 
> > fundamentally wrong with this approach? Thoughts/opinions? Anyone?
> > 
> > Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
> > Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>