Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[cdt-dev] Warning about use of nightly builds.

This bug brings up a good point. The nightly builds are built against the 
latest available Eclipse integration build at the time of the build 
(Monday-Friday 3 a.m.) As such, there is a good chance that they will not 
work against previous Eclipse builds, especially as binary 
incompatibilities are still possible "as the Eclipse churns", and man is 
it churning!

Just a friendly reminder that nightly builds are use at your own risk, but 
thanks for helping with our test effort :-) If you require a stable build, 
please use one of the Milestone builds (e.g. M7 and the upcoming M8).

Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, IBM's CDT Architect
Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada
----- Forwarded by Douglas Schaefer/Ottawa/IBM on 03/23/2004 04:20 PM 
-----

bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx 
03/23/2004 04:17 PM

To
Douglas Schaefer/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
cc

Subject
[Bug 55636] BuildConsole missing and .log fills up on missing 
org.eclipse.jface/resource/ResourceRegistry






https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=55636

dinglis@xxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dschaefe@xxxxxxxxxx



------- Additional Comments From dinglis@xxxxxxx  2004-03-23 16:17 -------
Doug, what platform version are you building the nightly builds with? This
ResourceRegistry is new in the integration builds. The classes 
ColorRegistry and
FontRegistry never extended the ResourceRegistry before, and now they do. 
Is it
possible that compiling CDT against the new platform is causing binary
incompatibilities with older platforms. Should we be warning people who 
use the
nightly builds that they should use at least the same platform version 
your
building with?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



Back to the top