Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Re: Eclipse CDT Bug "Make" sometimes doesn't start in Win98

We are certainly not supporting Win98, or WinME in our announced Eclipse based products.

At 03:17 PM 9/3/2003 -0400, Thomas Fletcher wrote:
My vote is to make Windows 98 unsupported.  NT support is deprecated,
it won't be long until Windows 98 is too.

Thomas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alain Magloire [mailto:alain@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: September 3, 2003 3:14 PM
> To: owe@xxxxxx
> Cc: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Re: Eclipse CDT Bug "Make" sometimes
> doesn't start in
> Win98
>
>
> >
> > Hello Alain!
> >
>
> Bonjour,
>
> >   I searched for a bug in CDT in Win98, i have the same problems
> >   described in bugreport
> >   https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=36688 from List
> >
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&order
=map_assigned_to.login_name,bugs.bug_id,
>   i have visited this page frequently but finally nothing changes for
>   a couple of months. Do you know if there is a perspective for
>   Win98 users?


Good question, I will put this to the cdt-dev mailing list(CC: to the
mailing list).

        is Win98 a supported platform ?


The problem, java.lang.Process is limited:

- On windows with the jdk-1.3.x
 * everytime java.lang.Process is executed a dos terminal appears, very
annoying.
 * java.lang.Process does not have IPC, like signal. This needed by the
debugger
   to suspend a running process.

- Solution was to provide a JNI glue, libspawner.so, feature:
 * the debugger could use it to send a signal to suspend an appliction
(SIGINT).
 * suppress the dos terminal.
 * use also for other dependent stuff like getting the PID list etc ..

- caveat
 * Win98 API is different then the rest of WinXXX
 So spawner is not working properly on this platform.

- Possible solutions
 * make Win98 unsupported.
 * fallback to java.lang.Process for this platform with the problems
enumerate above.

Feedback please, would like resolve this for 1.2


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev



Back to the top