[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] JNI support
|
I am curious.....what was the verdict on the JNI support issue with CDT ?
Is there a plan in place to provide JNI support capabilities for upcoming
releases of the CDT ? Or does CDT already support the same ?
I would also like to see "seemless" integration while debugging JNI
applications and stepping from the java to the C code debuggers if
possible.
Please let me know.
Regards,
- Amit Aghara
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Jeffrey Dever |
| | <jsdever@sympatic|
| | o.ca> |
| | Sent by: |
| | cdt-dev-admin@ecl|
| | ipse.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 04/24/2003 09:01 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | cdt-dev |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| cc: |
| Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] JNI support |
| |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Stepping from the java debugger to the C debugger and back would be the
ultimate. I'll put that on the features list but it will be some time
before I get to that level of integration.
Ed Burnette wrote:
>This would be useful to us if we could step in the debugger from Java code
into JNI C code and vice-versa. Seems like it should be part of CDT and not
independent. It would be easier to develop independently at first if CDT
was extensible enough (i.e., had the right extension points and public
APIs) but I don't know if that's the case.
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:16:25 -0400
>>From: Jeffrey Dever <jsdever@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [cdt-dev] JNI support
>>
>>I am considering adding support for JNI programming. The
>>initial goals
>>would be to provide awareness of javah, association of classes with
>>native methods and the associated C/C++ implementation and command
>>completion of JVM functions through the env pointer.
>>
>>I'm seeking advice. Has any work been done in this direction? Would
>>this be considered for CDT or better as an independent plugin? Would
>>anyone (other than me) find this useful?
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
