[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[cdt-dev] Re: [cdt-patch] Register View Persistence
|
At 04:40 PM 4/4/2003 -0500, Mikhail Khodjaiants wrote:
And
this preserves only the first level structure of the register tree.
Moving to dev.
Ah, I see the extra level now.
In practice I've certainly never seen this created and I don't have a
testcase for it. I don't have any faith what-so-ever that I'd get it right
without a way to test it. If you have any suggestions for how to set
switches so that CRegister returns true to getValue().hasVariables(), I'd
be happy to add additional level support if only because once our testing
folks find those switches they will be asking for it anyway.
Thanks!
-Chris
Mikhail
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Songer" <songer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:20 PM
Subject: [cdt-patch] Register View Persistence
>
> Hi,
>
> Step through a function return and see the open groups in your register
> view close. That seems to be because the IStackFrame is different, even
> though the underlying register model is the same. (Still, the register
> model could change I suppose.) Our usability testers hated it.
>
> So, please find attached a patch that causes the register view to remember
> what register groups are expanded and restore them to their expanded state
> across stackframe changes. The patch was based on 1.0.1. It looks to me
> like it will cleanly apply to the head, but your mileage may vary.
>
> Thanks!
> -Chris
_______________________________________________
cdt-patch mailing list
cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
