[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] addr2line invocation
|
Hi,
Thanks for the info. I think putting it in the build model is smart. I'll
just hack something in that works for us and look forward to the real fix
coming in the April release!
Thanks!
-Chris
At 02:35 PM 3/14/2003 -0500, Alain Magloire wrote:
>
> Chris Songer wrote:
> > I'm quickly getting to the
> > point where the same workspace needs to be able to build with two
> > completely different toolchains that have different versions of these
> > tools. What's the right way to get different addr2line's plugged in?
>
> I have no idea unforturnately, but it would be cool if you could add any
> information at "http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27936".
> Your problem is a generalization of what is described there, but since
> I'm the one who filed the bug and nothing has happened since, I don't
> think broadening its scope is any problem.
>
Good points,
Integration of those tools(ar, addr2line, c++filt, nm, objdump etc..)
is tricky because they have to work in the eclipse workflow.
But providing a consistent interface for them via the
BuildModel(IToolChain) is
a good step.
We are currently, working on a Java implementation for some of them:
AR, ELF, PE, COFF, STABS, etc ..
Providing java implementation when possible avoid the spawning of external
tools,
which is always a pain. In one of the PR that Johan submit, Addr2line did
not flush
its output causing the thread to hang ... sigh.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev