[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] JavaCC and the JJ file.
|
> What I would like to shoot for is that we merge the
> NewParser1 branch into
> HEAD sometime next month so that we can ensure that we are
> concentrating our
> efforts on the solution going forward. A preference could be
> provided to
> allow the user/developer to choose their parsing framework
> for the outline
> view in order to minimize the risk regarding 1.0.2 quality.
>
> Not that I'm officially committing just yet (as I'm still
> pounding through
> the ANSI C++ grammar as I write this) ... I'm just wondering
> if anyone has
> an opinion about this strategy.
Agree 100%. The sooner we get the new parser itto the head branch,
the sooner we can put miles on in. I also agree with you that
scarce development time will be better spent on the new parser,
as opposed to fixing the old one.
My 0.02$ :-)
Sebastien
>
> JohnC
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schaefer, Doug [mailto:dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:35 AM
> To: 'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] JavaCC and the JJ file.
>
>
> Thanks, Alain,
>
> We'll also take a look at when we can get enough of the new
> parser working
> to generate ICElements as well. If this is soon, it might be
> the better way
> to go.
>
> Doug Schaefer
> Senior Staff Software Engineer
> Rational - the software development company
> Ottawa (Kanata), Ontario, Canada
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alain Magloire [mailto:alain@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: February 25, 2003 8:03 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] JavaCC and the JJ file.
>
> >
> > There are quite a few things that the current parser
> doesn't pick up.
> > The one that is bugging me lately is the WINAPI and friends macros
> > that blow
> up
> > the function they are modifying. We need to get something
> in for the
> April
> > delivery (can I call this 1.0.2?) to bring the quality level of the
> outline
> > view a bit higher that what we've got.
> >
> > Alain, since we're not scheduled to release the new parser
> until after
> > April, would you be interested in committing the work you have done
> > with
> the
> > old IBM parser? Or fire a patch at me so that I could
> polish it off
> > and
> get
> > it in? Then, we should also be able to add in the K&R
> param decls as
> > well (hopefully easy...).
>
> I will take a look at it again, seems so long. To get it
> going, I wrote a
> basic C Preprocessor(although evaluation of expression was
> still missing)
> and moved things around to generate the ICElement. Let me
> see, if I can dig
> this out again.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
