RE: [cdt-dev] CDT extensions Proposal

["Schaefer, Doug" <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey guys,

I just made a quick pass through your proposal.  The first thing that came
to mind was that it looks like some of what your are proposing here can be
accomplished using Natures.  Certainly associating builders is usually done
this way.  You could probably associate different tools with a project this
way as well.  Were there problems with Natures that you ran into?

Having a nice API to manage data in the .cdtproject file would be useful,
though.  Build info is a great candidate for this.

Doug Schaefer
Senior Staff Software Engineer
Rational Software - IBM Software Group
Ottawa (Kanata), Ontario, Canada
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Magloire [mailto:alain@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:08 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: cdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT extensions Proposal


This is preliminary work, some of the extensions describe in the paper
does reflect the current code, but we are woking on it.

http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/cdt-core-home/docs/c
dtproject_extensions.html?cvsroot=Tools_Project


Thanks.

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev