RE: [cdt-dev] Sam's Build Model is in

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [cdt-dev] Sam's Build Model is in

From: "Robb, Sam" <sam.robb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:59:32 -0500
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcLYOHi3E/9cZESBRXKA/jmjk4Gn7gAEJjIQ
Thread-topic: [cdt-dev] Sam's Build Model is in

> Instead of having *Point classes ex: CToolPoint etc .. why 
> not use the current provided scheme, the ICExtension.

Because I'm not as familiar with all the intricacies of
Eclipse/CDT as I would like to be :-/

I'm looking forward to seeing your proposal.

-Samrobb

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Sam's Build Model is in
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Binary parser proposal
Previous by thread: RE: [cdt-dev] Sam's Build Model is in
Next by thread: RE: [cdt-dev] Sam's Build Model is in
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs