[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT packaging and versioning suggestions
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Burnette [mailto:Ed.Burnette@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:15 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT packaging and versioning suggestions
>
>
> If you download the regular CDT package and then the CDT
> Source package on top of it for the right machine, then you
> can then import the binary projects and view source in
> Eclipse. This is nice but can you cut out the extra step and
> just have one package that includes both? I.e., make it work
> like the platform sdk package. The CDT zips are only about 1M
> each so if somebody doesn't want the source it doesn't seem
> like a big penalty.
What does the community think? Is this an issue for you?
>
> Also, I think calling the frozen branch and the head builds
> the same version number (1.0.1) is confusing. Would it be
> hard to switch the head builds to 1.0.2 or something?
I agree with Ed on this one. Should we change the version number on the head
to 1.1.0? At this point in time I do not think that we have a build 1.0.2
planned.
Ideas comments ...
>
> Finally on the download page I think it would be easier to
> use if you put the "Latest Releases" first, then the "Current
> Stable Builds", then the "Current Nightly Builds". The closer
> you can mimic the Eclipse Project download page
> (http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/index.php), the better.
>
The CDT Downloads pages has just been revamped and looks more like the
Eclipse downloads page.
Thanks for the suggestions Ed
-Judy
