Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Build Model Proposal Status

Well actually there are no developers working for "org.eclipse"; most or all of the "committers" are at commercial companies like IBM and QNX and others who have developed the features and decided to make them open under CPL so everyone can use them. Although contributing code isn't required like with the GPL it's still a good idea because if everyone does that, it's like having thousands of free developers working on your product. And as it says here:

   http://www.eclipse.org/tools/team-leaders.html 

"The Eclipse Tools Project is a meritocracy. The more you contribute the more responsibility you will earn." So although I'm not a committer yet and I can't speak for the current ones, as a user of CDT I encourage you and others to contribute what you've done back to the community so we can all benefit from our collective knowledge and experience. Just my opinion. Thx.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Songer [mailto:songer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:50 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx; cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Build Model Proposal Status
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Sorry, what we implemented for Project Management is 
> Tensilica internal 
> right now. We implemented internally because we were going to 
> get nailed on 
> usability without it and I was not getting a good vibe that 
> org.eclipse was 
> going to come up with anything in the short term.
> 
> Thanks!
> -Chris
> 
> At 11:29 PM 1/11/2003 -0500, Ed Burnette wrote:
> >Where can we find the source code for this? Will it be part 
> of the regular 
> >CDT build?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chris Songer [mailto:songer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:07 PM
> > > To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Build Model Proposal Status
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Tensilica decided to just go ahead and implement 
> something for us. We
> > > didn't have time to wait for consensus in the community over
> > > a holiday and
> > > in the end, it's not very hard.
> > >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cdt-dev mailing list
> >cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 


Back to the top