[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] New build paradigms
|
>
> I think CDT should support 3 types of builds out of the box:
>
> 1. (The default) A make-less build modeled on the JDT. CDT would know =
> (through preferences) the commands and options needed to compile sources =
> and link objects. Incremental builds would be done on saves.
> 2. Building with Ant, which would leverage all the Ant development =
> work already going on, and
> 3. Building with an external Make tool. Since Make files are not as =
> parseable and rewritable as Ant files they would have to be created by =
> hand, mainly for legacy projects.
>
When talking about C/C++ projects lots of code are using and still using
Makefile/Make as the builder, I would not call them legacy projects yet 8-).
for (1) Yes, but you still need some sort of persistency. Whether you use
.classpath for the JDT or Makefiles or some other mechanism(Ant) or
some propriatery (XML ?) format.