| RE: [cdt-dev] CDT needs a new plugin |
Agree. There is a reason why the other components are doing this, but it's not overly clear to me. Is it to simplify making installation of the source optional? Whatever it is, I'd say go for it.
Doug Schaefer
Senior Staff Software Engineer
Rational - the software development company
Ottawa (Kanata), Ontario, Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastien Marineau [mailto:sebastien@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:31 PM
To: 'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT needs a new plugin
This is to match the other components (Eclipse, JDT etc)
where the source plugin is where the source for the components
lives when installing it. We seem to be the only project without
a source plugin yet...
I will ask that this be created. I suggest we make the commiter
list be the same as those maintaining the feature plugin (since
they all have to do with packaging and distribution).
Any thoughts? Everyone agree?
Regards,
Sebastien
>
> Sebastien,
>
> Could you shake your "baguette magique" and create a
> org.eclipse.cdt.source
>
> Think we need the approval of the PMC, for this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev